Industry NewsHypocrisy

AG Ellison Slams ‘Fall of Minneapolis’ (But There’s a Catch)

'Partisan Propaganda' cry falls flat thanks to one inconvenient truth

The Fall of Minneapolis” is more than the year’s most provocative film.

It’s a battle cry against both Fake News and false narratives promoted across the culture.

The Fall of Minneapolis

The Alpha News documentary shreds so much of what we were told following the 2020 death of George Floyd that it can’t help but red pill some viewers.

That group doesn’t include Keith Ellison.

Minnesota’s Attorney General belatedly weighed in on “Fall,” a film that paints him and other Democrats in a brutal light, during a public forum held last week.

Scott Hennen, host of the radio show “What’s On Your Mind,” asked Ellison for his thoughts on a documentary that has racked up nearly 5 million views on Rumble and YouTube combined.

“I have not seen it,” Ellison said. “My opinion is that it’s not factually based … I think that it is partisan propaganda.”

Imagine a film critic reviewing a movie without actually seeing it. This is multitudes worse given the stakes at play.

George Floyd protests: Unrest escalates in demonstrations in more than 30 US cities

Hennen pressed the Attorney General a bit more, asking why body camera footage taken before Floyd’s death, sequences highlighted in the film, didn’t make it into the courtroom.

“In America, you have the right to counsel because your counsel is going to be a vigorous, zealous advocate for your case. I have to assume that if [defense attorney] Eric Nelson did not put that video in, it’s because it didn’t help his client. Unless you’re going to say he’s incompetent. The judge made sure the trial was fair. It was all on television, everyone in the world saw the trial,” said Ellison, whose office led the prosecution of Chauvin.

Liz Collin of Alpha News and the film’s director, director Dr. JC Chaix, responded to Ellison’s comments.

“If this was the violent murder that he claimed it to be, why did we not have more of this direct evidence, police body worn camera? Why was there not more of that evidence in this trial? Why did the prosecution not present this? Instead, they focused on exhibit 17, a still frame photograph of Derek Chauvin in a position that they wanted to present that fits their narrative,” Chaix said.

Ellison also told Hennen that he wished the film had more voices critical to the Floyd matter on screen.

Collin said her team spent months trying to speak with Ellison for her book “They’re Lying: The Media, The Left, and The Death of George Floyd,” which inspired the film.

He repeatedly declined.

The very least Ellison could do is to watch the film, available for free on two major video platforms. That he hasn’t done so speaks volumes.

9 Comments

  1. Prone like Floyd

    by MPLS COP BF
    I was held down just as long as GF

    I am proof that a normal person would survive that police restraint.

    I am the victim of Officer Involved Domestic Violence
    that was COVERED UP

    No one listened to the cries of those from north Minneapolis

    And no one listened to a petite white college educated female
    My crime = GIRLFRIEND OF MPLS COP

    A Minneapolis police officer – THIRD PRECINCT
    He is now a SERGEANT. He probably trained Chauvn.

    I am proof a normal person would survive MRT.
    I am proof that the MPD did indeed use that restraint.
    As it was used on me. My abuser would be Chauvin’s superior.
    He probably trained Chauvin.

    When I first saw the video
    I immediately thought they murdered him.

    But with more thought
    And based on my own experience –
    I truly believe Floyd died due to his own actions and his own health.

    I am physically fit.
    I used to rollerblade and play racquetball with my cop boyfriend.

    Floyd was clearly exerted before he was on the ground.

    I need JUSTICE.
    SO DOES CHAUVIN.
    MY STORY is new evidence.

    I was PRONE LIKE FLOYD
    ENDURED AN ASSAULT WAY WORSE THAN FLOYD’S
    AND I AM ALIVE.

    SPPD AND MPD COVERED UP THE OIDV
    AND ALL GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS HAVE TURNED A BLIND EYE

    JUST RECENTLY
    I STARTED A TWITTER ACCOUNT
    TRYING TO EXPOSE MY INJUSTICE
    I REPLY TO WALZ, KLOBUCHAR AND ELLISON
    MY INJURY PICTURES ARE POSTED ETC,
    AND THE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS ARE STILL IGNORING MY INJUSTICE

    LOOK AT MY TWITTER
    KLAWRENCE reallaketonka

  2. Ellison also “won” by a mere 20,000 after putting out a request for more votes at 4 pm. “we’re behind”

  3. Destroy america was the plan : Punish and demoralize law enforcement: Reward criminal behavior. Destabilize society.
    This case was a hinge in the plan. “Seemingly” overnight 340 billion was poured into DEI (strategic divisiveness) polices by WEF corporations. “Spontaneous” riots, defund police movement. “Color” hires everywhere. Merit obsolete. Millions into Bullies Launching Marxism. God’s Plan: use all for good :great awakening, reformation and revival: It’s Go Time !

  4. It’s really sad and maddening. How can it be made to gain traction? People aren’t hearing about it in MPLS and the nation..

  5. Maybe because he has something (anything) to do. Also in the film they vilify Ellison for defending a gang leader in court, when it was his job to defend them, he was a criminal defense lawyer. This is the USA, he was a criminal defense lawyer defending a criminal.

    1. Ellison is the attorney General of Minnesota. He is no longer a criminal defense attorney. But he is a fraud.

    1. Prosecutors in the U.S. are constitutionally obligated to disclose any info that could aid in the defense of someone accused of a crime. . .in the interest of justice and perception of impartiality. So why did Ellison actively, purposely, with no consequences (yet) actually withhold exculpatory evidence?
      Is he just another incompetent DEI house negroe serving his progressive Masters?
      Is he a Soros AG that wants to actively undermine the U. S. rule of law?
      Ellison has pointed to political (not law based) issues and remedies.
      Was it a political persecution for a political purpose?
      What was the End Game where there would be no negative consequences to him personally ?
      And why would there be a GF mural in muslim Kabul?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Back to top button