ReviewsMovies

‘Okja’ Might Make You Disconnect Netflix

Hate rarely makes for great comedy.

Look no further than the late night landscape. Comedians spew monologues brimming with bile, leaving audiences with one simple question.

Where are the jokes?

A similar fate suffocates “Okja,” the Netflix satire from “Snowpiercer” auteur Bong Joon-ho. The South Korean director co-wrote the film, bringing the same over-the-top style that nearly crushed his 2014 global warming screed.

Or should we say his income inequality rant. Yet “Snowpiercer” was so inventive, and darkly fun, that the sermonizing couldn’t slow the film’s hurtling train.

“Okja” is another matter. And, as bad as the movie it (and it’s awful) the film features one memorable bug -- the worst comedic performance of the last 20 years.

Okja is an adorable “super pig” created by the magnificently evil Mirando Corporation. CEO Lucy Mirando (Tilda Swinton, going the full Tilda Swinton) sends Okja and a gaggle of similarly scientifically engineered pigs to farmers across the globe.

Why?

It’s an international competition to see who can nurture the very best super pig possible. Who will then be eaten, of course. It’s all for marketing purposes.

That makes no sense. “Okja” is just warming up.

Ten years later we meet Mija (Seo-hyeon Ahn), a South Korean girl whose guardian raised one of those pigs. She’s grown attached to the creature, brought to life by elegant, spectacular FX. The visuals are so perfect you quickly believe Okja is as real as the Fido at your feet.

FAST FACT: “Okja” drew boos at the Cannes Film Festival, but not for any content reasons. The movie’s Netflix roots caused a stir at the event, as audience members hissed over a company upending the theatrical model.

The director stages these sequences with love and compassion. He’s always been a master visualist, and he flexes those muscle in these captivating moments. Then, the wicked/evil/no-good/rotten corporation comes to reclaim its property. He’ll be delicious!

Get it? Because companies shouldn’t make meat for mass consumption.

What follows is an all too obvious attack on the food industry and, in various doses, capitalism. One needn’t be a meat-eating, MAGA hat-wearing type to recoil over “Okja,” though.

It’s dull. And finger-wagging. And clumsy in almost every way that counts.

Scene after scene wears you down, the screenplay attempting satire but managing to create flop sweat theater instead. Key plot points are hammered home so often it’s like the cast forgot the story and had to keep reminding us what’s at stake.

Swinton, who can be a revelation in the right role, is wildly over the top in not one but two insufferable parts. She’s practically Buster Keaton reborn compared to her co-star, Jake Gyllenhaal.

OKJA Jake Gyllenhaal
Jake Gyllenhaal is one of several reasons ‘Okja’ is a massive fail.

The “Life” star plays the host of an animal TV series in the Steve Irwin mold. It’s like Gyllenhaal had never seen a comedy before, and every time he mugged the director kept screaming, “more, more … MORE.”

You’ll wince and wish you could un-see every second.

RELATED: ‘The Oath’ Gets Crushed by Trump Derangement Syndrome

The film also features a group of sweet, cuddly Animal Liberation Front folks trying to save Okja from his fate. They’re aggressively kind because so many radicals are these days. They wear black masks in true Antifa style and have cute names like Red and Blond.

It’s here where “Okja” uncorks its one subversive moment, and it’s a beaut. A member of ALF is so weak he can barely move. Why? He doesn’t want to consume food because doing so leaves too big a carbon footprint.

“Okja” is alternately whimsical and ghoulish, and the director has no ability to marry the two tones. Late in the film, he trots out some random police brutality as if he wanted to snare that critical Black Lives Matter demo.

The animal cruelty moments are equally in your face. So is the casual profanity littering the screenplay. Like “CHiPS,” “Baywatch” and other recent misfires, repeated F-bombs is a sure sign of creative decay.

And “Okja” is nothing if not a prime example of black comedy chaos in its purest form.

HiT or Miss: “Okja” isn’t just a heavy-handed slap against capitalism and the meat industry. It’s a stink bomb gussied up as a “subversive” satire.

Samuel Martins

Show More

13 Comments

  1. Christian, your personal politics infect this vitriolic review more than any I’ve seen in quite some time. Maybe that’s your bag (I’ve never heard of you before today)–no one is trying to stop you from cheering on big game hunters, and eating your burgers, so try lightening up a bit. It’s obviously not a movie for you.

    1. Don’t forget his idiotic & nonsensical rant about Black Lives Matter. This is what he was thinking about while watching Okja.

  2. Whoa this guy is seriously bias and has some issues on his own, you are the one ranting about stuff, Okja is excellent and you are just resented. I hope you find peace someday bro.
    Second: At Cannes they were ranting too, if netflix this, blah blah blah, when the fact remains Okja is a beautiful and excellent crafted movie, you did not wanted to win, just do better.

  3. Awe poor baby no likey great movie that almost everyone else enjoys? Your ‘review’ (rant) is horribly written (seriously, think about changing careers) and is littered with invalid analogies throughout. But I gotta tell ya, it gives me immense pleasure that a film featuring a giant sow headed for the slaughter house but rescued instead by the teenage girl that raised her, upsets you so much. I find that very satisfying but also quite pathetic.

  4. Christian, I don’t know what is your problem but I really enjoyed this movie for one reason. I can watch this movie on my time not in the theater where you have to follow all showing time. I think this is the future direction of our movies should be played and distributed. A big applaud to Netflix and this film director to make such a good movie on our time. I can assure that this movie will be a blockbuster. And you need to chill a little, Christian…

  5. Congratulations Christian, you successfully pissed off the Cinema Fanboy Snowflake brigade! Remember: as a critic, you are obliged to simply agree with popular taste instead of providing your honest opinion and assessment, even if it means incurring the wrath of people who have never heard of Buster Keaton. And oh yes, you are only allowed to let your political views inform your work if you’re to the left of Ken Loach.

    1. I agree with your comment and the author’s right to have his own opinion/break consensus. I do think the author took the article too far in an effort to drive traffic including the headline. No one is dropping their Netflix account after watching this movie. I found the movie interesting and futuristic. Yes it highlights on animal cruelty, but I wouldn’t say that it discourages meat consumption as the author suggests. The movie mocks the weary ALF character who “thinks it’s a crime to eat any living food”. IMO the author missed the ball and focused on a political narrative because it will generate more clicks.

  6. Curious which leftist website drove these commentators? This is a website for conservative entertainment coverage, so you all haven’t broken some mysterious story about the viewpoints.

    1. IKR, I also enjoy the fact that the criticism is all just “This film was good and you’re a big meanie!”

      No one actually quibbles with anything he said in particular.

      1. Note also, the conservative views are only out of place in a critical piece. If it is a rave the conservatism is not an issue.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Back to top button
Close