Industry NewsOpinionMovie News

Is Gender Card Only Hope for ‘Ghostbusters?’

The studio behind the upcoming “Ghostbusters” reboot released a second look at the comedy today. The new trailer offers a broader peek at the story, the special effects and the updated Slimer. That’s the infamous ghost from the 1984 original, for those not weaned on Bill Murray’s blockbuster romp.

Ghostbusters Official Trailer #2 (2016) - Kristen Wiig, Melissa McCarthy Movie HD

What’s still missing? The laughs. And, more importantly, a reason to get excited above and beyond nostalgia for the source material.

The first trailer got shellacked by consumers, shattering the record for most negative reactions to a YouTube clip. Expect a kinder reaction to Trailer 2.

But not by much.

What’s a movie marketing team to do? Throw down the Gender Card, of course. The latest salvo? Team up with Hillary Clinton.


Clinton will appear along with the “Ghostbusters” stars on the May 25 episode of syndicated talker “Ellen.”

RELATED: Carolla – Hillary Win Will Spark Sexism Protests

The Democratic front runner is no stranger to playing the Gender Card. Her campaign slogan is “I’m With Her,” and her acolytes routinely dismiss criticism of her persona and policies as “sexist.”

For months, those defending “Ghostbusters” did the same thing.

Many declared the hate channeled toward that trailer was unabashed sexism. That’s how The Washington Post summoned up the outrage. Yet even co-star Melissa McCarthy critiqued the sneak peek.

So pairing Clinton with the “Ghostbusters” cast makes sense, if only to double down on the Gender Card. Host Ellen DeGeneres has a history of fawning over Clinton, and by having her share the stage with the film’s cast the message will be clear.

Attack the film and you’re attacking women.

You can even hear that in the new trailer. Leslie Jones, one of the four Ghostbusters, does a stage dive expecting to be caught by a wave of concert goers. Instead, she drops straight to the venue’s floor.

“So I don’t know if it was a race thing or a lady thing, but I’m mad as hell,” she cries.

The generic victim card is hardly a recipe for success. Movies like “Ghostbusters” cost a fortune. In this case, that’s roughly $154 million, an early figure that doesn’t include the massive marketing costs.  And getting back in the black isn’t just about those box office receipts. The movie is meant to start a new franchise, sell plenty of merchandise and possibly kick off other “Ghost”-related features.

Playing the Gender Card might mean the movie sells enough tickets to cross the $100 million mark. It also might push away as many viewers as it attracts.

It’s exactly the opposite of the Marvel Model, the gold standard of modern movie marketing.

RELATED: How Marvel Trumps DC … Big Time

Marvel movies don’t get political. They avoid ideological agendas. They simply entertain while telling tales tied to our modern era.

That’s how you make movies that bring in $300 million and up, as “Captain America: Civil War” is currently doing.

Director Paul Feig and the “Ghostbusters” team want it both ways. They demand we treat swapping out the all-male original cast with actresses as nothing unusual. And certainly nothing that should be critiqued at face value.

Yet, as the movie’s marketing machines wheezes and coughs closer to the July 15 release date, they weaponize the movie as an attack on sexist Hollywood.

Hollywood IS sexist. The best way to battle that isn’t to play the Gender Card. It’s to make more good movies written by and starring women.

That doesn’t require any card play whatsoever.


  1. Well, the real indictment against Hollywood is their inability to let properties live on their own and to create new things. In 1970 did anyone go, “Man, where is that sequel of Gone with the Wind?” Warner’s put up, in one week recently, reboot projects for CHiPs, Three’s Company, and Dungeons and Dragons. Not projects anyone is clamoring for, but the projects have name recognition.

    And with Three’s Company, how do you tell a story about a straight guy pretending to be gay without GLADD getting ticked off no matter how they work it? I mean, the whole morality that a guy can’t just be friends with two women… the Ropers would have just been sued for that in this day and age.

    The Ghostbusters reboot looks kind of okay, but the characters are broad sitcom types and yeah, it is weird that they want to reboot it, but draw on love for the originals at the same time.

  2. I was initially intrigued because I thought Bridesmaids was hysterical. But the “Social Justice Warrior” angle is definitely turning me off.

  3. It’s always been about gender with this film. Always. They started out labeling all those who don’t like it misogynists. It’s a nice neat way to avoid valid criticism as well as promote buzz for your crappy film.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Back to top button