ReviewsMovies

Christopher Nolan’s ‘Odyssey’ Is a Stunning, Frustrating Triumph

Look past the casting controversy to find an epic yarn worthy of the auteur

Christopher Nolan doesn’t believe in half measures.

The industry’s most bankable director swings for any fence he can find. That means for every creative misstep in his films, there’s a sequence that will blind you with greatness.

It’s the best way to describe “The Odyssey,” Nolan’s retelling of Homer’s epic poem. It’s masterful and maddening, a triumph that occasionally can’t get out of its own way.

It’s a must-see experience, in a theater, of course. And, with a few tweaks, it might have lived up to every molecule of the pre-release hype.

The Odyssey | Official Countdown Trailer

Matt Damon stars as Odysseus, the Greek leader aching to return to his family and homeland. He spearheaded the military attack on Troy, a battle won courtesy of an overstuffed Trojan Horse.

He’s had enough war and death, but the journey home may be his most perilous assignment.

His loyal wife (Anne Hathaway) is considering any number of suitors to replace Odysseus in his absence, but she clings to hope that he’ll come back unharmed. Young Telemachus (Tom Holland, miscast) also pines for a father he barely knew.

Other souls hope he’ll stay gone forever, including Antinous (Robert Pattinson), a soldier with murky allegiances.

The massive cast includes Lupita Nyong’o as Helen of Troy, but her modest screen time belies the pre-release frenzy surrounding her casting. Elliot Page, another casting news kerfuffle, falls into a similar bucket, but the screenplay plays up the character’s bravery in ways that confirm some critics’ fears.

It’s a distraction. The miscue is also a microscopic part of a three-hour production. It should be processed as such.

The Odyssey | A Look Inside

Nolan’s films often demand multiple viewings to unlock their narrative tangles. “The Odyssey” may deserve that treatment for spectacle alone, but even with his penchant for nonlinear plots, this tale is deceptively simple.

So, too, are the set pieces, which feel as raw and magnificent as anything we’ve seen over the past few years. A fascinating encounter with a hungry cyclops rushes to mind.

Stunning. Jaw-dropping. Add your favorite superlative here, and it’ll fit like a glove.

Could anyone, be it Spielberg, Tarantino or Scott, render what we see with such spectacle? It’s not online activism to shout, “not a chance.”

Yet flaws abound, and they magnify during a chaotic third act. A film like “The Odyssey” shouldn’t ape a “John Wick” installment in its visceral overkill, yet one battle does just that.

And a strategy laid out by a key character feels as uninspired as it is absurd. That third-act wrinkle upends the film’s otherwise solid pacing.

So do the presence of supporting players (Zendaya, Charlize Theron), who should impact the story but don’t. John Leguizamo is somewhat better as a blind man with strong ties to Odysseus. He, too, suffers from a previous plot device that can’t be shared here.

And, yes, it all matters. The greatest directors of our age could use a neutral soul to advise them against such obvious miscues.

Nolan is working on a different level than every other filmmaker today. His grasp of technology, his eagerness to wow with every shot, is unrivaled. Some of his recent projects have reflected his cool, almost detached approach to character, but Damon’s performance flicks away such concerns.

The actor has never been so invested in a character’s humanity. The film’s anti-war bona fides will grab plenty of attention, but it’s only a small part of his performance.

This is the film that may make us stop taking Damon for granted.

Nolan’s mastery has never been in doubt. So why are the film’s first few moments burdened by sound issues that make deciphering the dialogue a chore? Why tease out the film’s modern anachronisms with a rap-like bard (Travis Scott) and use current profanity to break the movie’s spell?

Geniuses like Tarantino, Cameron and Nolan need someone to rein in their self-destructive impulses. Yet we rarely see that partnership bloom.

At least, the evidence on screen suggests as much.

No matter. A flawed, frustrating epic from Nolan is better than two dozen generic features. Long may he noodle with perfection, even if he never quite gets there.

HiT or Miss: “The Odyssey” finds Christopher Nolan lunging for greatness, and succeeding more often than many of his peers.

28 Comments

  1. Having seen (and owning) all Nolan’s movies (from Memento through Oppenheimer) and enjoying every one of them (multiple times in fact), I was excited to hear that Nolan was taking on the Odyssey. However, over time, there was all the major issues that have been brought forth (I will not state them here as it appears everyone knows already).
    I still went to see this movie with my wife (primarily for her birthday wishes); I’m not a film critic like Mr. Toto here, but I’d have to say that despite the beautiful way of coming at the story, I will not go to see this again nor think of owning it.
    Possible spoilers — I handled the race baiting of a black Helen of Troy fairly well (if you noticed, the ship’s crew seemed very “diverse” and I’m not absolutely sure the ancient Greeks didn’t have slaves of other races with them). She didn’t seem as integral to the story and she could’ve been cut out.
    I even enjoyed the way they portrayed the creatures and sorcerers and such (especially Circe turning the men to pigs; while disturbing to watch, it was an excellent take on that portion)
    My two biggest issues (which were more like toxicity to a meal rather than grizzle on a good steak dinner that can simply be cut out) were the dialogue (way too modern; it sounded like childish middle school banter at times) and Ellen Page (it’s bad enough in real life that she pretends to be a man, it’s even worse that her character in this movie seems instrumental to the Trojan Horse plot; after all, she takes the place of Robert Patterson’s character who later on wants to marry Penelope played by Anne Hathaway).
    When the reveal came out of who Ellen Page’s character was, it actually soured the remaining portions of the movie (despite them being done decently).
    I sincerely believe that the only reasons this movie has done, is doing, and will do well is because of the name of Christopher Nolan; he’s making a name for himself and that’s the reason people want to see what he directs.
    Obviously this whole thing is just my opinion on it.
    If you have already seen it, I hope you have some of the same issues and will consider not viewing it again. If you haven’t seen it, while it’s up to you, I recommend not wasting your time primarily because of the issues I mentioned.
    God Bless.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Back to top button