Kimmel Flat-Out Lies About Charlie Kirk’s Alleged Killer
Nothing is beyond the pale for weepy, fact-free hate night host
It’s a dispiriting question with an obvious answer. There is no bottom.
The host of “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” proved it anew last night. Kimmel used the death of conservative icon Charlie Kirk to attack President Donald Trump.
Gross. Beyond gross, actually.
Jimmy Kimmel compares President Trump mourning Charlie Kirk to a 4-year-old mourning a gold fish.
This is the guy that literally cried after President Trump won in 2024, btw. pic.twitter.com/sca7MSNB1w
— MRC NewsBusters (@newsbusters) September 16, 2025
To do so, he cherry-picked news clips to hammer home his ghoulish point. Trump mourns Kirk’s death like “a four-year-old mourns a goldfish,” Kimmel cracked.
Trump had a long-standing friendship with Kirk. That didn’t matter to Kimmel. He weaponized their bond to smite the president for political points.
How does he sleep at night? No, really. How?
Just know Kimmel has a writing team to come up with these zingers. Late-night’s slow death is a self-inflicted wound, no doubt.
That wasn’t even the worst part.
RELATED: THE SAD DECLINE OF JIMMY KIMMEL
Kimmel also said Kirk’s killer was a MAGA type, not a hard-Left monster who wanted to silence Kirk’s conservative Christian beliefs.
“The MAGA gang are desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them,” Kimmel said.
Projection on steroids and complete Fake News. (and is it too much to ask for some jokes?)
- We know the killer hated Kirk and targeted him specifically
- He wrote far-Left talking points on the weaponry used to fire off the fatal round
- The killer’s family, while conservative, said their son took a radical, hard-Left shift in recent years.
- The killer lived with a trans roommate in a romantic relationship
These are the facts that we know at this point. Facts that Kimmel ignored to hammer home the Left’s false talking point on the murder. And it’s working, sadly.
% who say that, as far as they know, the person who shot Charlie Kirk is a Democrat | a Republican
U.S. adults 21% | 24%
Democrats 8% | 41%
Independents 15% | 21%
Republicans 40% | 13%https://t.co/SBCCre1pMG pic.twitter.com/Pb6gSZwsmQ— YouGov America (@YouGovAmerica) September 15, 2025
Later, Kimmel trots out the dumbest liberal talking point in recent memory – anything Trump does is meant to distract us from the Epstein list. You know, the list that the previous administration had but kept all the dirty Trump bits secret for four years.
Yeah, that list.
A first-year poli-sci major shouldn’t fall back on that pathetic trope.
That’s just lazy.
Instructing his sycophantic audience that Kirk’s killer was MAGA isn’t lazy. It’s a deliberate attempt to distort and divide.
Or, just another installment of “Jimmy Kimmel Live!”
We have Kimmel who was suspended for a few days and then we have an Australian Doctor who lost his license from liking a handful of Babylon Bee articles on his personal social media.
The Left insists on seeing conservatives through their view of what they think a conservative should be. That’s why they think anyone with a gun is a conservative, because they’re like, “oh, anyone with a gun is supporting the second amendment! Got you there!”
But it’s not. As much as I don’t like guns, they protect vulnerable elderly people, physically disabled people, and women from being picked on as much by violent gangs. They make things more fair in a fight.
It’s pretty obvious reading about Robinson that he believed free speech was the same as fascism and should be met with violence. Kimmel needs to wake up and realize that it could’ve been him that was murdered instead of Charlie Kirk if Kimmel was a conservative instead of a leftist. Kimmel does have some sway in society; if people see him condemning murder than they might be less likely to murder. Instead Kimmel is promoting conspiracy theories.
They dems are trying to have a hay day with this one. “Trump is taking away free speech”.
The network does not have to keep or pay anyone, just like any other company in the USA and absorb the impact of that employees rhetoric, not does that company need to sit back and wait for that employee to cause them to receive an FCC fine or a lawsuit. A company does not have to remain associated with someone whose inflammatory beliefs the leadership of said company believes may be harmful to the company’s reputation or business volume. The company does not have to allow this person to represent their company in any way, shape, or form. nor does the company have to associate with the person or their public views. STOP crying that ‘this is cancel culture’ like you aren’t guilty of cancelling people in your very petty way of doing so and realize that the networks and companies in NO WAY have to remain liable for comments that employees make and if that company thinks that that employees views do not align with theirs and can be harmful to the company, they reserve every right to cut ties with that employee.
I bet ABC cancels Kimmel!!!
Check social media … you’re more right than you know
it’s not really cancelling. It’s ABC protecting their a$$es. There is no law that says a company has to keep an employee who may a bad fit for their image or wallets.
I don’t see a lot of daylight between his comments and those of Alex Jones. If AJ was liable for slandering parents of slain children, shouldn’t Robinson’s parents, conservative Republicans, be given the same concern?
And water is wet
He seems like a smarmy person who, judging by his permanent smirk, somehow has a high opinion of himself. I’d like to see him follow Colbert out the door, probably too much to hope for. Wasn’t he ready to leave the country because of Trump? That’s something he could do to make the country a better place