These Maligned Movies Deserve a Second Chance

They aren't classics, but a fresh viewing suggests time has been kind to them

I’m not going to pretend “Star Wars: Episode 1 – The Phantom Menace” wasn’t one of the most disappointing movies of all time.

Fans had waited 16 years for George Lucas to revive his wonderful Star Wars saga. He had the opportunity to give us what we had been hoping for for so long. But both the script and the filming felt like they were first takes, and what in the world is a trade federation doing in a “Star Wars” adventure?

Put these complaints aside. “The Phantom Menace” is still an enjoyable film. Anyone ages 8 to 80 can enter into the magical realm of “a galaxy far, far away…” and go on a fun ride.

And no, I never thought Jar Jar Binks was all that annoying.

Star Wars: Episode I- The Phantom Menace 25th Anniversary Re-Release Featurette- Screenvision (2024)

While I can see where the second episode is painful (my third least favorite film of the franchise––just ahead of Episodes 9 and 8, respectively), and episode three is better, “The Phantom Menace” doesn’t deserve all the hate that it has gotten over the past 20-plus years.

Somebody else out there must have something nice to say about it…right? Note: “The Phantom Menace” scored an impressive second-place finish earlier this month during its 2024 re-release.

‘Superman III’ (1983)

Not long ago, I wrote how “Superman: The Movie” is still relevant, and why it remains my favorite comic book movie. While I can understand arguments against the fourth installment, “The Quest for Peace,” I’m surprised “Superman III” isn’t well liked.

After all, it has everything you’d expect in a Superman film. The sequel embodies the essence of a Superman comic book more than any of the other films. The story seemingly jumps off the pages onto the big screen.

Superman III (7/10) Movie CLIP - Superman Reborn (1983) HD

It has charm, humor (thanks to a great performance by Richard Pryor), good guys who are really good and bad guys who aren’t so bad. Plus, it has the standard Superman characters that we love (even if they appear only for a brief period, including Margot Kidder’s Lois Lane).

Plus, we get a cinematic glimpse of Superman’s hometown of Smallville and meet Lana Lang (Annette O’Toole).

I know some of it might seem cheesy, but it’s aimed for 8-to-10-year-old boys and like I said, it’s a Saturday morning cartoon that sprung to life. It’s fun, lighthearted and innocent––and that’s what a Superman movie is all about.

‘The Legend of the Lone Ranger’ (1982)

All three of these movies speak to the inner child in me. There’s nothing like the adventurous spirit of a young boy. And those of us who grew up watching The Lone Ranger reruns know this.

In fact, I still have a vinyl record album of “The Lone Ranger” radio serials. So it’s no surprise the 1981 film would be something I gravitated toward in adulthood.

But it wasn’t until the past year or so that I learned of “The Legend of the Lone Ranger’s” poor reputation.

Why? This is––well almost––the perfect Lone Ranger story. I mean, sure, if it had a top-name director, A-list stars and a script polish it could have been better.

As is, “The Legend of the Lone Ranger” does justice to the masked man’s legacy. You could tell they wanted to get it right.

It sticks true to the character’s origin story, packs plenty of action, fine cinematography, a decent soundtrack and a good cast. “Taxi”-era Christopher Lloyd does a fine job as the villain.

I’m curious what the actual Lone Ranger’s actor’s voice sounded like (veteran actor James Keach replaced star Klinton Spilsbury’s vocals.)

And like “Superman III,” it embodies the character’s spirit almost perfectly, even slightly in epic form. I realize that’s a stretch, but it’s superior to the painfully awkward 2013 version starring Armie Hammer and Johnny Depp.

Jeff Miller is a husband, dad, pastor, artist, writer and all-around good guy (for the most part). He lives in the Western Finger Lakes Region of New York State with his wife, Diana. He has three grown children. Jeff has two blogs of his own, A Closer Look and Flashback Friday Christian Music Review. Jeff is also a contributor to Kingdom Winds, where you can read his sermons online.

This column originally appeared at A Closer Look.


  1. I’ll agree Phantom Menace is nowhere near as bad as people make it out to be. It really seemed to have kicked off that annoying internet trend of making it very fashionable for people who have never created anything in their lives to pile on and hate something because they see others piling on and hating it since it can’t live up to the rose colored memories of childhood nostalgia.

    In reality it seems SW 1 and 2 both have about 7 minutes of eye-rolling dialog, that people love to pretend takes up the whole 2 hours.

    Though these days I have at least some respect for anything that tells an original story and isn’t either a complete rehash or tired lecture on diversity and “girl power”.

  2. The Phantom Menace is just an abysmal film and story. First and most importantly, it is not Star Wars. Star Wars is a send up to the serial films first half of the 1900s. Star Wars is stereotypical good versus evil in a simple non-political fashion. It is grounded in the hero archetype and the hero’s journey. Luke moves from a whiney insulated child to a hero who resists the simple, easy path, never giving up, fighting through losing a hand, being savagely beaten by a snow-beast, and watching his entire squadron blown away and still tries to do the right thing. Phantom Menace is a heavily political story where evil wins or breaks even. It would have been far better as an obviously adult-aimed movie outside of the Star Wars universe.

    The acting across every character was awful, unbelievable, forced, and whiney. Amidala enters into a romantic relationship with a partner well below her age and station. JarJar is annoying and arguably a racial slur. The characters are forced into decisions and behaviors that feel unrealistic. The machinations of the villains is obvious, heavy-handed, and unbelievable. The hijacking of the Christ story for Anakin is pathetic. The deformation and debasing of The Force to a genetic trait is insutling and an obvious ploy to delegitimize religion.

    The Phantom Menace very simply is the opening salvo in the progressive deconstruction of the Star Wars spirit. In 1977, Star Wars gave an entire generation, if not the entire world, an injection of heroism and role models to embrace, and the chance to aspire to be more and better than we were. That spirit stands in direct opposition to The Progressive Menace and it had to be eradicated ~ thus began The Empire and the Dark Times of Star Wars prequels and post-trilogy sequels.

  3. The Disney Grooming Syndicate admitting:
    1) We recognize that our far-left social and political agenda has damaged our company’s reputation and profits, and
    2) We have no intention of changing.
    How about putting Profit, Competency, tradition, intelligence over Woke Diversity, Equity & Inclusion social goals.

  4. Haven’t seen Lone Ranger, but I agree with the first two. They’re both fun in their own way, and whether you want to admit it or not, it’s always fun to look at eye candy, and the special effects in Phantom Menace still hold up as impressive 25 years later.
    Richard Pryor in a super hero movie? Who could possibly resist that?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Back to top button