Media Attack Coldplay for Heartfelt Charlie Kirk Tribute

There’s a phrase this reporter can’t stop using on X and elsewhere.

You can’t hate the media enough.

It’s an odd thing for a journalist to say, but it’s not said in haste. Just consider the bloated list of media malpractice John Nolte tracks as Exhibit A.

Exhibit B? The Russian collusion hoax.

C? The Hunter Biden laptop.

D? President Joe Biden is sharp as a tack.

You get the idea. 

Now, several media outlets are framing a heartfelt display by British rockers Coldplay into a sad, twisted attack. The mega-group shared some warm wishes to people in need from Wembley’s iconic stage Friday, and lead singer Chris Martin included a shout out to the late Charlie Kirk.

“…send love anywhere you wanna send it in the world. There are so many places that might need it today …you can send this to your brother or your sister, you can send it to the families of people who have been going through terrible stuff, you can send it to Charlie Kirk’s family. You can send it to people you disagree with, but you send them love anyway… “

It’s a beautiful sentiment. Loving. Caring. Universal. Kind.

BREAKING: Coldplay’s Chris Martin tells his audience of 80,000+ to send love to Charlie Kirks family during final night at Wembley

It’s no longer about left vs right. It’s about humanity vs insanity. pic.twitter.com/tBts2oNeeE

— Inevitable West (@Inevitablewest) September 13, 2025

Except in 2025, when select members of the Left would rather cheer Kirk’s death than mourn the loss of life. Just consider a new database, reportedly 20,000 members strong, and counting, of these twisted souls.

Or, read how Parade Magazine framed Martin’s plea.

Coldplay Fans ‘Booed’ and Left ‘Disappointed’ After Charlie Kirk Tribute

At a Wembley Stadium show, Coldplay’s message of unity took a surprising turn when frontman Chris Martin dedicated a moment of reflection to conservative activist Charlie Kirk — sparking mixed reactions from fans and igniting an online debate.

What’s missing? Proof of any mass expression of anger or rage. The article cites four people, two on X and two on Reddit.

Why, it’s almost like the author wished the blowback into existence.

Over at Rolling Stone, the framing proved more severe.

The far-Left outlet served up a neutral headline, but the lede suggested Coldplay deserved a fresh round of backlash. The band stumbled into a viral video thicket earlier this year when a concert camera captured a seemingly cute couple … who happened to be an adulterous couple.

Coldplay can’t seem to escape controversy of late, even when they’re trying to preach love for all humankind

The rest of the Rolling Stone story is behind a paywall. It might have gotten worse from there.

The Express Tribune played up the so-called outrage even harder, citing the same X user as a previous article.

Some backlash.

The extreme-Left Daily Beast played into a similar theme, once again without receipts, dubbing the moment a “controversy.”

Why? Two reasons.

It’s ginning up a controversy where none exists for clicks. That’s just shoddy journalism.

And the various outlets likely agree with the few voices raging against a band for sending heartfelt wishes to the late conservative and his family.

Is there another explanation?